RE: QuestionI dont work for MGM and my only stake in MGM is if Newco in fact is formed.
I dont understand you. Most of your knocks are against AUQ, yet you claim to remain long.
You are continuing to make my point for me. You say the only NI 43 101 from AUQ is ficticious until proven, but dont like having 1 million ounces of un-challenged and proven ounces added?
You are against AUQ when convenient and Agains MGM when convenient yet almost entirely hypocritical in all your statements. I believe your intentions have shown, and after reading an earlier post you seem to fit the profile.
I doubt I will continue this with you. You have exposed yourself, so there is no further need.