Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Resverlogix Corp T.RVX

Alternate Symbol(s):  RVXCF

Resverlogix Corp. is a Canada-based late-stage biotechnology company. The Company is engaged in epigenetics, with a focus on developing therapies for the benefit of patients with chronic diseases. Its epigenetic therapies are designed to regulate the expression of disease-causing genes. The Company's clinical program is focused on evaluating its lead candidate apabetalone (RVX-208) for the treatment of cardiovascular disease and associated comorbidities, and post-COVID-19 conditions. RVX-208 is a small molecule that is a selective bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) inhibitor. BET bromodomain inhibition is an epigenetic mechanism that can regulate disease-causing genes. RVX-208 is a BET inhibitor selective for the second bromodomain (BD2) within the BET proteins. It partners with EVERSANA, to support the commercialization of RVX-208 for cardiovascular disease, post-COVID-19 conditions, and pulmonary arterial hypertension in Canada and the United States.


TSX:RVX - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by amorakon Sep 02, 2007 3:33pm
280 Views
Post# 13333844

RE: Yawn!!! And other reactions...

RE: Yawn!!! And other reactions...bfw With respect to your responses, it may be that the combination of the success of NexVas PR to the point of it being dispensed like candy, and compelling anecdotal and correlative evidence of the lack of Alzheimers in NexVas CVD patients, could conspire together to diminish the potential of a NexVas AD market to the point of insignificance, too small for a billion-dollar trial. However, a quantitative rather than qualitative test for Alzheimers would speed up trials considerably and might allow the 2 indications, CVD and AD, to be concurrently treated well within the patent window for NexVas PR (RVX208). I wouldn't hold my breath on that, though. I think the real value of AD is patent extension as you say. But this argument works better for a company that owns it all than it does for the owners of single NexVas programs. Look at what happened to Pfizer's market cap when Torcetrapib failed. The impending patent expiration of Lipitor, the subsequent loss of billions in annual revenue and the lack of a replacement therapy and/or Lipitor combination therapy caused a $22 billion loss in market valuation. For a mere 2 or 3 billion now, a pharma may have a wellspring of therapies with which to control APO-A1 therapies for half a century along with control of a host of plaque and inflammation related indications, many not discovered yet. As you suggest, the method of discovery not only provides exclusivity, it also provides alternatives should RVX208 fail and, most importantly, the opportunity for patent extension through reformulations and new indications. But I disagree with your view of the pharmas' outlook. I think they'll look out that far if only to prevent another pharma from doing so. I think it would be irresponsible for a pharma to allow another pharma to do that and worse, to be seen to be doing that. It's one thing to lose a bidding war, it's another to win a battle now only to watch your own decline and fall later, certainly not a pyrrhic victory, but less of a victory than it could be. Certainly it could place the legacy of current pharma management in jeopardy. You accurately reflected my thoughts, pushups.
Bullboard Posts