Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

EDM Resources Inc V.EDM

Alternate Symbol(s):  SWNLF

EDM Resources Inc. is a Canadian exploration and mining company that has full ownership of the Scotia Mine and related facilities near Halifax, Nova Scotia. Through its wholly owned subsidiary, it also holds several prospective exploration licenses near its Scotia Mine and in the surrounding regions of Nova Scotia. The properties are comprised of exploration licenses and a mineral property lease that provides for zinc and lead exploration and development. The Scotia Mine is located approximately 62 kilometers (km) northeast of Halifax, Nova Scotia, in the Halifax Regional Municipality. The Project consists of about 648 hectares (ha) of mineral rights in the form of three contiguous mineral leases. It also holds five exploration licenses covering 41 claims in the immediate vicinity of the Scotia Mine Deposit. Its Eastville Prospect is an undeveloped zinc-lead exploration prospect. Its Carrolls Farm and Carrolls Corner Prospects are hosted within the Gays River Formation.


TSXV:EDM - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by junior_mineron Sep 28, 2007 4:10pm
115 Views
Post# 13490711

RE: Any change for a smelter?

RE: Any change for a smelter?Great Joe! I knew I could trust you, very nice. Comments herein: - First, I'm sorry to say that your SWN concentrate figures are incorrect. They are for contained metal, and UG increases that amount. 1.62 mt is a good number to use for hybrid mine plan. "2.Benchmark Capital Cost in the order of $ 200 million" -Benchmark for what capacity? “$267 million. A spokesman for Udaipur, Rajasthan,-based Hindustan Zinc told AMM that the 100,000-tonne-per-year zinc“ This must be for refined zinc. It's enormous capex and implies 2B+ cost for a smelter that SWN needs. “ US$100 million, which includes a payment of US$13 million for zinc related inventories. The Nordenham plant, which is located near Bremerhaven in northern Germany, has an annual production capacity of 133,000 tonnes zinc metal,” This looks better, implied capex $600M. “Brook-Hunt, the most respected metals consultants, said this aquisition cost compares very favourably with any brownfield or greenfield smelter. Works out to US$690 per Metric Tonne of installed capacity of refined zinc metal ingots” I understand $690 was for this deal, not a benchmark price (Correct if I'm wrong). Using that price, SWN's smelter would cost about $550M “TCs correspond to the deduction made by the smelter from the payment to the miner for the conversion of concentrate into saleable metal. The higher these treatment charges are (the higher the deduction from the payment to the miner), the lower the purchase price of raw material ” -As of smelter take, base TC/RC, and price participation, they are all income for smelter to handle opex, amortization/deprecation etc. We can't make any assumptions about the actual opex of running one. Certainly it won't match TC/RC exactly. It's safest to assume that running their own smelter doesn't decrease overall smelter charges (smelter take included). “ An estimated long term average treatment charge is $US170 per tonne of concentrate. ” Many use $200+/t by now. I think we still need more smelter references ... but we're getting there, so thanks.
Bullboard Posts