Silk Energy Ltd SLKEF

RE:Milly back at ISM again

[Buxom1]

Another Rocksolid post on LBE: https://www.stockhouse.ca/bullboards/viewmessage.asp?no=16607909&t=0&all=0 "whaler, Where I come from if you have to lie to make your point, you're not up to much. That's what you're doing now in your effort to convince this poster of your holier than thou effort to explain how you have taken the high road in attempting to reform me. As I told you before, and you chose not to acknowledge - I respond to posters with the same amount of civility as they choose in their exchanges with me. It was you, that started the name calling with me, and after giving you the benefit of the doubt for awhile - that's when you started getting the same back from me. If you want reference to the posts involved - just ask. Now maybe you could refer me to the post where you are taking the "wimpy and spineless" reference from - because I did not explain "that it would be viewed as "wimpy and spineless" where I come from not to take everything to task". You are purposely taking something I stated out of context - which is equivalent to lying. Show a little backbone and refer me to the post - don't take your usual chicken$hit approach of pretending I'm on ignore, and avoiding the subject. Sure I take you to task on your supposed "technical analysis". You don't know what in the hell you're doing in TA, and you're using it to pump the stock you invested in. If you want to pretend to have something special to offer others, you should be prepared to be challenged when its shown you are not qualified. I don't just bad mouth you without giving reasons for my opinion. I have showed where your TA conclusions were laugable when related to what was happening to the share price. But the ultimate example was when you chose the indicator that you said you put credence in - and that very indicator contradicted everything you had said from May to Sept. So keep on posting LBE TA on the LBE board, LBE/TA comparisons and ISM biased hype in the guise of TA. And I'll keep on critiquing your performance, which to date has been dismal. I notice someone from one of your former sites for providing TA challenged you today - seems he judged your abilities much as I do. As for the phantom report - I'll deal with it when its released. If this report is like the the Cooper report, and the cheerleaders handle it the same as last time, why shouldn't it be challenged. This [as rocksolid calls it] consultant's report is treated by some like its a valuation bible. Its nothing of the kind - and calling it what it is shouldn't rile everyone. I'd say that's a much "higher road" than deceiving people by convincing them it has weight as a reserve valuation source. Its just like pointing out that whaler's TA is nothing more than disguising biased pumping as scientific or expert analysis"