GREY:SLKEF - Post by User
Post by
Buxom1on Oct 27, 2007 2:04am
160 Views
Post# 13701836
Re: 1st daily bash from Millwright on ISM
Re: 1st daily bash from Millwright on ISMAs posted by Rocksolid on the LBE board:
https://www.stockhouse.ca/bullboards/viewmessage.asp?no=16613587&t=0&all=0
"Abie,
That was a beautiful essay - but you're a fiction writer. The Cooper report with a target is a piece of paid for promotion, that in the first part of the year was a fine weapon for the Vancouver shills to promote the price up past the target. The marks were ripe for the picking in the spring nickel frenzy - the "report", supported by public information that was not used, and some of which was altered, included a target that became a self-fulfilling prophecy in the hands of the promoters. Ask some of the ones that got sucked in by the hoopla how great their return has been since they bought in at the price the CEO was selling at.
The deceitful part of the report as it is used here, is you and that wannabee geologist TXProInvestor taking the information and pretending it has any relation to a resource valuation - or the geological information required to interest a suitor. The reality is the company would be terrified to release a legitimate resource valuation at this time - they are promoting at hoped for future results - a dose of reality in the current share valuation would cause the price to plummet.
You can yap about your trusted advisors until you're blue in the face. The truth is the company's trusted advisor Jensen, the professional geologist, has stated that one year's work is required to determine whether the company has an economical ore body. If you think the CFA that took part in the last "Report" is a trusted advisor in determining resource values that a suitor would require, you're a real rube. That's about as dumb a conclusion as your statement that the volume of the past while is mainly coming from shorters - that's about the dumbest thing I've ever read on this forum.
But why trust Abie [aka Clueless in Seattle] - he has to lie about LBE/ISM comparisons. Said LBE paid 3 times the commission that ISM paid - and then walked away when it was proven he was lying. How are readers to know when you're lying - as compared to just exhibiting a lack of knowledege, Abie? Or does it matter?"