Silk Energy Ltd SLKEF

Re: BUX now in bashing with Milly

[Buxom1]

Rocksolid, As stated before if you have a problem with Millright's posts on the ISM bullboard then deal with Millright on the ISM board. Until such time as you do I will be duplicating your posts from LBE back to their original source (the ISM bbs). You state that I am 'bashing' this is conjecture on your part - I am merely duplicating your posts. According to Merriam-Webster's online dictionary: https://www.merriam-webster.com/ Main Entry: bash .... 1: to strike violently : hit; also : to injure or damage by striking : smash —often used with in 2: to attack physically or verbally intransitive verb Main Entry: duplicate ... 1 : consisting of or existing in two corresponding or identical parts or examples 2 : being the same as another Main Entry: conjecture ... 1obsolete a: interpretation of omens b: supposition 2 a: inference from defective or presumptive evidence b: a conclusion deduced by surmise or guesswork c: a proposition (as in mathematics) before it has been proved or disproved As posted by Rocksolid on the LBE board: https://www.stockhouse.ca/bullboards/viewmessage.asp?no=16617151&t=0&all=0&TableID=0 "OR" you could just stop bashing Bux & John or are you that thick "As posted by Rocksolid on the LBE board: https://www.stockhouse.ca/bullboards/viewmessage.asp?no=16613587&t=0&all=0 "Abie, That was a beautiful essay - but you're a fiction writer. The Cooper report with a target is a piece of paid for promotion, that in the first part of the year was a fine weapon for the Vancouver shills to promote the price up past the target. The marks were ripe for the picking in the spring nickel frenzy - the "report", supported by public information that was not used, and some of which was altered, included a target that became a self-fulfilling prophecy in the hands of the promoters. Ask some of the ones that got sucked in by the hoopla how great their return has been since they bought in at the price the CEO was selling at. The deceitful part of the report as it is used here, is you and that wannabee geologist TXProInvestor taking the information and pretending it has any relation to a resource valuation - or the geological information required to interest a suitor. The reality is the company would be terrified to release a legitimate resource valuation at this time - they are promoting at hoped for future results - a dose of reality in the current share valuation would cause the price to plummet. You can yap about your trusted advisors until you're blue in the face. The truth is the company's trusted advisor Jensen, the professional geologist, has stated that one year's work is required to determine whether the company has an economical ore body. If you think the CFA that took part in the last "Report" is a trusted advisor in determining resource values that a suitor would require, you're a real rube. That's about as dumb a conclusion as your statement that the volume of the past while is mainly coming from shorters - that's about the dumbest thing I've ever read on this forum. But why trust Abie [aka Clueless in Seattle] - he has to lie about LBE/ISM comparisons. Said LBE paid 3 times the commission that ISM paid - and then walked away when it was proven he was lying. How are readers to know when you're lying - as compared to just exhibiting a lack of knowledege, Abie? Or does it matter?"" My sincere apologies to the ISM forum as imo the focus on each board should be on issues pertaining to that particular company.