Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Silk Energy Ltd SLKEF

Silk Energy Limited is a Canada-based resource company. The Company acquires undervalued oil and gas assets in Kazakhstan. The Company, through its subsidiaries, owns a 50% interest in the KMG Ustyurt license (Ustyurt). The Company focuses on exploring and developing Ustyurt, an onshore oil and gas concession comprising approximately 6,500 square kilometers in the Caspian Sea region of the Republic of Kazakhstan.


GREY:SLKEF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by millrighton Feb 15, 2008 11:33am
143 Views
Post# 14379493

RE: Working Capital for ISM Dec 31 07

RE: Working Capital for ISM Dec 31 07wailer, You will note that the amount ISM has is much closer to what I forecast, than your fellow cheerleader tiny tonyg was spouting about. Another point is that ISM committed themselves to a very extensive exploration effort when they renounced exploration expenses related to the flow through issue. This company that has finally managed to get a third drill operating, after talking about it for months, managed only a piddling $600,000 per month exploration expenditure in the last quarter. How will they make out managing expenditures of more than double that amount in 2008? My bet is that even with all the additional time available from not having to manage the Jasper property [on which they did nothing, anyway], the pressures of getting rid of this spending committment will be so great, that another year will pass without a NI43-101. By the way, no one has ever explained to me why the NSR purchase recorded in the statements for the year ended September 30, 2007, was never announced until November 2007. This company seems to favour doing things retroactively. The NSR announced months after it had happened, along with contradictory [and non-sensical] explanations for dishing out the funds. And a retroactive stock dividend, that if worth anything, will benefit some former shareholders at the expense of current shareholders. Quite a bush league bunch of movers and shakers guiding this junior company!
Bullboard Posts