Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Silk Energy Ltd SLKEF

Silk Energy Limited is a Canada-based resource company. The Company acquires undervalued oil and gas assets in Kazakhstan. The Company, through its subsidiaries, owns a 50% interest in the KMG Ustyurt license (Ustyurt). The Company focuses on exploring and developing Ustyurt, an onshore oil and gas concession comprising approximately 6,500 square kilometers in the Caspian Sea region of the Republic of Kazakhstan.


GREY:SLKEF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by millrighton Feb 21, 2008 4:05pm
113 Views
Post# 14523136

RE: Timmins Talk [Wilburrr]

RE: Timmins Talk [Wilburrr]Wilburrr, At the risk of seeing you permanently ostracized for daring to receive a message from me, I hope for your sake that things do start turning around in this company. I don't share your enthusiasm for RM pulling any rabbits out of the hat, but maybe your fellow Texan is a sign that someone with clout is going to start making demands. There are different views on how to best exploit whatever the property is blessed with - but I think even proponents of the quick take-over will admit that there are some basic improvements in management policy and performance that would improve the company image for potential investors and maybe give existing shareholders some comfort. Supporters don't want to hear that there may be negative implications involving L2 boundary issues and low grade ore. But failing to acknowledge the fact [or getting 43-101 proof that there's no problem?] is not doing the company any favours. The loss of credibility with those who know better affects the whole company, discounting some quailities that could otherwise be attractive. Dealing with the inevitable now, when the effect price wise may be nominal, could be beneficial in giving the company some credibility. As much as the supporters may disagree, the company's reputation is not great. Cleaning it up in advance will eliminate skepticism if there are some positive events down the road, to put a charge in the price.
Bullboard Posts