RE: McWaters productionJohn,
You hope cadomin has seen the error of his ways and will not transgress again. I'm a skeptic, when a number of new StockHouse members all pop up around a time that rocksolid had to discontinue, and they all start up with rocksolid's bashing theme, I become very skeptical. Curiously, all claim to have been invested in LBE and are concerned with the honesty of the CEO and the dilutive financing they say he lied about. Three of these bashers claim to have been at the Edmonton meeting.
Does it seem odd to anyone that has met Gary Nash, and got a feeling for his integrity and enthusiam for even one attendee to doubt his integrity? Yet all three mysteriously attend the meeting and become disenchanted because the company does a placement necessary for the company to continue its program. Coincidence, that three sign up on StockHouse shortly after the most active basher's sudden demise? I don't think so!
So we have this cadomin, who professes to hold shares in LBE, and has expressed some concern over how things are going in LBE. On a day that LBE announces significant drilling results on an important prospective property and the market moves it up amongst the top 5 percentage gainers on the TSX - what does cadomin do? He spends hours defending ISM, which dropped to again touch its 52 week low - and he comes over here and takes a couple of shots at the already explained delays at McWatter. Does this seem like the actions of someone invested in LBE? Why does this guy with shares in LBE [according to him], that states he has no shares in ISM as late as Feb 14, spend hours finding fault with LBE and defending ISM? Do I believe he's a LBE shareholder? I don't think so! Do I believe his agenda is to discredit LBE and Gary Nash? Most definitely!
When I run into another basher, I start comparing him to some of the others. A common thread emerges, they have very little mining knowledge. cadomin is scraping the bottom of the barrel - he exposed his ignorance on mining when he suggested that ISM drill results looked good after his explanation ".283% of 252 ft[core length] X 218 ft of [true] width. And in an area of 450m long! I guess its true that this is an open pit mine. I wish my Liberty was all over this." So why are these bashers, that are so ignorant of basic mining things, so enthralled with the negatives of LBE and the positives of ISM? Strike anyone as being odd? And how does someone that has such a backasswards conception of true width, keep coming up with new mining topics that he can twist into a negative about LBE?
Could it be that someone else is doing a bit of co-ordinating and coaching? You might say, who on earth would be interested in doing that? That's hard to rationalize, and I don't have the answer, but I have some questions. Like, who would be privy to the fact that meetings were held in confidence between LBE and ISM, and pass that information on so that rocksolid could use it to put LBE in a bad light? And why is it that a basher of Gary Nash, who actively pumped ISM during its promotion last year, when traced back is found to be an admitted promoter for a PR firm? And why is this same alias in the company of other aliases who have a common tie to companies involving a PR firm owner - the same one that was contracted as an Investors Relations consultant by ISM about a year ago? A lot of coincidences, is it not? I have more, but I think you get the point of why I am skeptical of the agenda of posters like cadomin, spray, millbutnonickel, and some of the predecessor aliases.
No John, I don't think cadomin will change anything, except maybe his alias. He might think twice about accusing the LBE CEO of being a liar, since you pointed out the risks involved - but I'm sure his agenda will remain the same, transparent as it is.