Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Limited V.MSQ



TSXV:MSQ - Post by User

Comment by junior_mineron Mar 21, 2008 4:59pm
394 Views
Post# 14758618

RE: I Discovered Cumo

RE: I Discovered CumoGeo or not, here's food for your thought. I can assure NDM will not use 6/lb Mo when their scoping study comes out. 6/lb Mo is only used for Cu equivalent calculations, which use 400/oz Au and 1/lb Cu. 15/lb Mo is currently the threshold price for the best primary Mo juniors to show decent IRR get build. Is that a glut? Surely does not affect MSQ. MSQ drilling suggest that grades are very good, if not improving going south. Any comment on that?
Bullboard Posts