RE: mapswailer,
I noticed you and the cheerleaders chose not to dispute the numbers I posted on the overwhelming lead LBE has over ISM when ore bodies are compared under a miningstockreports' type resource calculation. Your course of action was to relate to the impostor's comment about the height of his imaginary friend John who lives in an Edmonton suburb and is 5'5" and of no physical threat. This last bit of information was supposedly related to me. I can tell you that it is just as reliable as much of the information you cheerleaders rely upon. For starters I do not live in Edmonton, its suburbs or in any proximity. I do visit Vancouver on occasion though, possibly you or your impostor friend might want to arrange a meeting sometime when I'm there. Either one of you could then report back to the forum on whether you'd suggest a confrontation other than verbal - I don't pretend to know the combat abilities of the two of you, but sight unseen, I have the idea that it might be your sprinting abilities that would be your first choice of physical activity. Anyway, before your impostor friend makes much more of my comment about having his guts for garters, he should know that I was really playing on an oxymoron - its a contrdictory threat - impossible as it requires that he has guts.
Anyway, as check has pulled out those old maps that Abie referred to when he made the phony new ore body claim, let's get back to maps, properties and ore bodies. One map you might look at to put the Shaw Dome potential in perspective is one that shows the whole Shaw Dome. That is when you come to realize what a minor player ISM is in the Dome, especially when you assess the small amount it has done to identify new resources or expand its identified sites. The LBE and GCR properties dwarf the ISM claims - and new ore bodies have been identified by geologists by these other companies - ISM has that one hole that Abie and the God Father called a discovery.
Just to put the ISM situation in perspective - it claims to have 1090 hectares in properties in this area - LBE has over 12,000. If my math is correct ISM's total Shaw Dome property would fit in an area about 3.3km by 3.3km. And on a small part of this property, maybe .5km by .3km fill in drilling has turned in assay results, much of it averaging around .5%.
Tell me, on a comparison basis, if those Langmuir North rate highly against LBE's Groves Property, which like Langmuir North has no NI43-101 data:
Located 15km southeast of Gogama, Ontario, the project consists of a block of contiguous mining claims encompassing the Groves nickel copper platinum group metals ("PGM") deposit. The 28 mining claims consist of 400 units or 6,400 hectares which cover a magnetic anomaly interpreted as a large gabbroic intrusion. The anomaly is approximately 12 km long and varies in width from 1 km to 2 km. The center of the anomaly contains an historically reported resource of 500,000 tons (Canadian Mines Handbook, 1957) of 1.5% combined copper plus nickel above the 45.7m level in two separate zones (Pre NI 43-101).
There are some other numbers available on grab samples, and test holes open at depth, that make the potential even more impressive - but I thought that maybe the fact that the anomaly alone was bigger [maybe by double] than ISM's total property, might get the point across. And this isn't included in that huge headstart lead and extra exploration that I mentioned in that LBE vs ISM comparison a few posts back. No wonder you cheerleaders want to ignore the Pre NI43-101 comparisons - and of course your company hasn't got any independent comparisons - so you'd prefer to talk about your phony poster's imaginary friend from an Edmonton suburb - what a bunch of losers!