RE: RE: RE: LMAO @ Lopsided's "list"Aunties (since you are likely the same poster and thus violating SH terms of service), there are a number of points we should really address:
1) The diamond valuations for Renard are not yet completed. They can go higher as easilty as down. Larger samples will bring in more macrodiamonds, very large diamonds have been found see:
https://www.kimreport.com/the-stornoway-without-a-dion/
2) You are referring to the A154 South kimberlite pipe at Diavik, the richest one is currently being mined, not the others that have been evaluated and yet to be mined
3) You ignore the points about the other mines mentioned at Ekati, Victor, Soutthern Africa, Argyle. In a debate you address all of the points issued by your opponent, it is considered good manners.
4) You still have yet to admit your error, or clarify upon, in stating that mines with grades below 1.5 c/t are worthless even while acknowledging this in your post referring to the South African Labour costs
5) You do not comment on what professional skill you claim in stating that the mines costs will be $100/t
6) You continually insist on name calling. I have been very civil in my debate with you expecting a certain level of maturity. I could replace the "a" in aunt with a "c", but that would not make my argument any stronger, I suggest you consider that. Please cease with the name calling and refer to your opponents by their given avatars and they will do likewise.
7) You have yet to address if you were an Ashton Mining Canada shareholder.
8) You make companrisons to the cost per tonne of Renard, a mine that would be accessible by all year road, most likely, and Jericho, a mine twice as far north from Yellowknife as are Diavik and Ekati and dependent on a seasonal road. Also the proximity to a power grid should be considered.
9) Taking the 2nd hand statements by Will Purcell out of contexts and holding them to the same standards as an official news release.
10) Using "0.05 c/t" as an "example" when discussing Renard grades. For no particular reason other than to libelously make it appear that the deposit is low grade when it is not.
Failure to address these direct questions in a civil way will not only make me put you and whatever other avatars you go under to "ignore" but will also cause anyone with any sense to do the same after going through the post history.