Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Electrovaya Inc T.ELVA

Alternate Symbol(s):  ELVA

Electrovaya Inc. is a Canada-based lithium-ion battery technology and manufacturing company. The Company designs, develops and manufactures lithium-ion batteries and battery systems for energy storage, clean electric transportation, heavy duty electric vehicles and other specialized applications based on its Infinity Battery Technology Platform. The Company is focused on contributing to the prevention of climate change by supplying safe and long-lasting lithium-ion batteries. The Company is also developing next generation solid state battery technology at its Labs division. The Company has two operating sites in Canada and has a 52-acre site with approximately 135,000 square foot manufacturing facility in New York state. Its battery products are used across various applications, including material handling, e-mobility and energy storage.


TSX:ELVA - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by BadFinancialson Feb 25, 2009 6:14am
152 Views
Post# 15801390

How would FRAUD be different?

How would FRAUD be different?I have trouble envisioning it being much different.  Consider the bait-and-switch of characterizing this company as having small-format battery technology ready for the masses, raising $50 million, then the whole small-format premise evaporates into thin air. 

VS.

There never was a small format battery for Nokia cell phones, it was merely windowdressing, a working engineering prototype that did not have the requisite safety characteristics, performance, endurance, cost, reliability.

I have trouble understanding tannin's argument.
Bullboard Posts