RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NO, not at this priceObviously Pylot agreed to the low ball bid to liquify Capstone's SST shares so he can sell them easily if he wants to. SLW, because it knows their bid for SST is highway robbery, will offer a more equitable offer if the NO vote carries because SLW needs SST more than SST needs SLW. SST will do fine on it's own fundamentals if the merger doesn't go through. Bottom line is voting NO gives SST the opportunity to get a better offer from SLW. Voting yes assures that SLW's low ball bid will stand. That is NOT in the best interest of SST shareholders, but is in the best interest of Capstone. Nothing to lose & everything to gain for SST shareholders by voting NO.