Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF T.SST.U


Primary Symbol: SPTS

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Year U. The fund invests at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index and in securities that the Adviser determines have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities that comprise the index. The index is designed to measure the performance of short term (1-3 years) public obligations of the U.S. Treasury.


ARCA:SPTS - Post by User

SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF > rmarc--I concur with others, here
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by rmarcon May 08, 2009 10:30am
499 Views
Post# 15977829

RE: rmarc--I concur with others, here

RE: rmarc--I concur with others, hereI am only referring to Pylot's decision to give away SST for peanuts, nothing else. If you agree that SLW's offer is a very low ball bid, then you also agree that  Pylot did not do what is in the best interest of SST shareholders. He did what was in the best interest of Capstone & SLW. That is my only criticsm of Pylot & that is why I am voting NO.
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities