RE: RE: Hurdles at Fort a la Corneoldduffer,
I posted on this board because the article mentions SGF. Then I answered someone's question as to my position on SGF.
How am I biased against SGF? I have discussed most aspects of FalC in a balanced fashion and clearly state my conclusion. Others are free to differ. In terms of bias you see more bias coming from SGF or NMC in their news releases as they have a vested interest in putting the best light possible on SGF.
As of note, I fail to see the point of your criticism in your second paragraph.
I however have nothing to gain or lose regardless of how the share prices goes.
Nor is the KiM Report a business, but a hobby.
In your listing of people who post on SH you forgot two important classes:
1) The pumpers who are a counterpart to the bashers.
2) The individuals who are so emotional about a stock they hold that they cannot take any criticism of it.
As for you line of "I find your post on our board to be self serving ", it just as much my board as it is yours. We are both SH members.
You would do better in your argument to debate the technical point presented in the article, rather than make judgment on my credibiliy or interests as you clearly do not know much about them.
It never ceases to amaze me how incapable some SH users are in holdinga proper debate that only deals with the relevant points. Particularywhen the average age of the typical SH poster is probably well above 30.
Diopside