SGF criticismWell, of all the bullboards I post on, the SGF one does seem to have the highest number of candidates for the "least able to hold an intelligent debate" award.
Its one thing to debate a point on its merits, but to carry on in the way that some board posters he have been doing does not speak of thoughtful critique, but of willful ignorance backed by emotional investing.
My advice: go back, read and understand the article, go and look for some others, not necessarily from KIM Report, and come to your own conclusion. That's what due diligence means. Nowhere did I claim that the article or site was the only source of info, nor did I claim that you could not make money off this stock, just that I did not like the fundamentals of the project. Particulary in comparison to some others.
Now as many of those with an alternate point of view have made it very clear that they cannot hold a debate that sticks to the points, I'll have to take my leave.
Thank you for reading.
Diopside