RE: RE: RE: I requested INFO package:Wormbuster: Quite the contrary. Finally we have in the RH members, board members who are stakeholders, have a background of success and want ATQ to succeed. They are not fee and option collectors content to go up and down with the tides. I expect that they will start to scrutinize all past decisions, turning over the rocks as it were. I think best practices for the benefit of the company will be the order of the day.
You sound like you have extensive experience.
General question: if you were a selection committee of board members recruiting a new ceo for your company which had one head office and one plant located in Toronto, where would you expect the ceo to live? If when recruited, he/she lived in another city, what would be the best practice in terms of where you would expect him/her to live to fulfill the duties of a ceo? Would it matter where he/she chose to live? What would be the implications pro and con in fulfilling all of the duties of a ceo? If the ceo chose to remain in his/her non Toronto location, who should pay for that choice?