Silk Energy Ltd SLKEF

RE: RE: RE: Brutal Forum

[surething1111]

aatozz with plenty of BS in between.

"Nonsensical garbage" really ? Isn't this what you and driller have filled these BBs with for the past 3 years.  Anyone who doesn't step up to the "party line" is deemed a basher and a sociopath .  That's right whaler, you and your cohorts have spent most of your effort  on character assassination, and deflection, instead of arguing your case.  Could it be that it's hard to argue when there is no case.

S

PS Chew on this:
"A ll of us here are a bit disappointed at the recent results in this report,"  posted by Regio

Actually Regeo, I think I can speak for more than a few of us that aren't a "bit disappointed" at all.  For more than 2 years I know I've felt pretty confident about what I calculated to be in the ground.  That's why over two years ago I posted this:

"0.35% nickel grade does not make a mine imo. The weight averaged reported intercepts thus far come not even close to de-lineating the 1%+ grades that you are claiming. The tonnage is no where close to the numbers you are claiming either." 

So just to clarify no disappointment for me at all.  Had I of updated publicly that post after more drilling results were made available I might have been right on the 0.41% that it ended up being.  Alas,  this forum wanted none of my type intellect.