Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Limited V.MSQ



TSXV:MSQ - Post by User

Comment by junior_mineron Mar 03, 2010 11:43am
104 Views
Post# 16838156

RE: More info

RE: More info

"

(4) Mined production pounds reflected are molybdenum oxide and HPM.


Molybdenum production (000's lb)(4) 4,300 4,824 17,813 16,765 9,269

 

Note 4 cleary states

 

(4) Mined production pounds reflected are molybdenum oxide and HPM

 

So as I have said all along  TCM cash cost for all mines is for molybdenum oxide not molybdenum as you claim. "

---------------

You just wrote something very goofy. I take pleasure from the fact that you don't really understand this issue at all.

First it reads Molybdenum production. I.e. pounds of Mo contained in Molybdenum oxide and HPM. It's just another evidence of Mo pricing.

Secondly, "Mined production pounds reflected are molybdenum oxide and HPM ". When you say it has to mean that the pounds above are moly oxide, someone else could as easily say that the pounds are HPM. You are really goofy to suggest that. 

You lost this game long time ago. But you are just too crooked to admit, and too stupid to be quiet.

Bullboard Posts