GREY:HRIVF - Post by User
Comment by
production05on Mar 07, 2010 2:49pm
433 Views
Post# 16853174
RE: RE: RE: RE: Severstal complains to the OSC too
RE: RE: RE: RE: Severstal complains to the OSC too
``....Severstal......complained.....this is against the spirit of takeover rules.``
WOW!!!
That is unreal. Honestly. It`s unbelievable.
I wonder how they would categorize this approach:
*IMO, zero promotion of a publicly traded company (which benefits the majority shareholder in a takeover attempt)
*$.18 takeover consideration ($.22 offer) for share which traded for $3.50 less than a year previously, and with peer companies trading at the equivalent of $2.00 - $4.00 around the time of the offer
*almost a complete write-down of the most prominent undevelopment silver mine in the world (both in grade and ounce in ground) - with the write-down happening with a quarter of huge cash flow (which had a major of efect of suppressing the share price, IMO, of a company targeted for takeover by its majority shareholder)
*sale for peanuts (almost nothing), IMO, of the Novophirsovskoye project (IMO, still promising project), which resulted in a corresponding (material) write-off, which just so happen to partly mask the profits for yet another quarter, and suppressing the share price yet again (which benefits a majority shareholder in a takeover attempt)
*allowing significant dilution of shares to a company friendly to the majority shareholder, when minority shareholders were willing to provide assistance in seeking out more financially beneficial (less dilutive) funding opportunities
etc., etc., etc.