RE: RE: SCUDERIANgobe, you're wrong. He is not an insider or a director. He's a private investor like you and I, except with a lot more shares than us. That's it.
"His knowledge he had about company documents". It's all available to the public but not everyone knows how to find it. He does.
"Close contact with Mark" If you had as many shares as he does and treated the management with respect, they would treat you with respect including the CEO. Does not mean there is any inside information being passed. Other posters on this board have the same type of contact with the CEO and can confirm that.
"... his obvious bias as a pumper". He has a lot of money invested in this company, why shouldn't he pump? I also pump the stocks I own, I don't bash. He was not mindless (raaaa! raaa! raaaa! To da moooon!) type of pumper. Everything was based on facts. He answered all the questions that people on this board had for him. He backed them up with links, facts, etc. When he missed some timelines as far as the pps ie. that we'll be .40/ .50 c by now, he owned up to it. He told us straight that he was wrong. Now, this board is blessed with a few so called "pumpers" who know the company inside out. That is great to have. Don't knock it guys.
Alright, I know Scudy will be a bit mad at me for coming to his defense the way I did. Too bad! I consider him a friend and I don't like to see negative things said against him. He's too proud a man to come back and defend himself. So let's just stop mentioning his name and leave him alone, please. Hope this clarifies a few things. If not, too bad!