Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

VanEck Semiconductor ETF V.SMH


Primary Symbol: SMH

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.


NDAQ:SMH - Post by User

Comment by snoopydogson Oct 04, 2010 2:09pm
200 Views
Post# 17526034

RE: RE: RE: RE: Lawrence Roulston

RE: RE: RE: RE: Lawrence RoulstonWould have to agree with you Stick2Facts.  Roulston is too well known and too good for this thing to just be sitting basically dormant when the company needs hard cash and now.  I don't know about his insider list but looking back there never has been a run of late on this stock so I doubt that is a factor.

I still would like to see Wallster just step in and take this thing over.  Looking at the entire company the only invested insiders are Bending, the late O'Gorman, and the former Greg McRae.  So firing this entire company off would be no problem and he could maybe feel sorry for Bending and keep him around as a cheesy VP, but dial him back big time on his executive salary.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>