RE: sell at .62 The sell at .62 wasn't a sure bet. They would only have purchased if they had enough shares tendered.
.
How much of a locked in written, bonded, signed, sealed and certified "guarantee" does one need in order to act? That was as good as "free money" gets! It was ultra low risk! Sure, I get it, it is easy to find some kind of "risk" in any situation and use that as a reason to take no action. I and a few others here pounded the table on this issue, but either it was too scary or too small potatoes for most to adopt. So they held their shares and didn't buy any additional ones. Me? That low risk, "free money" trade was one of my top ten trades for the quarter.
.
As I pointed out before. Professional traders will take a low return, low risk trade any day. While the retail traders is always flailing around loosing money because he's got millionaire eyes and is always swinging for the fence. Games are won by stringing together singles & doubles and the trading game is won by locking in a steady series of small gains. You'll make more progress locking in a series of nineteen 5% gains than swinging for the fence and perhaps hitting on one in 20. That is what the pros know, so if one is swimming with the sharks, doesn't it make more sense to learn to play their game then act like chum?
.
I'm just sayin'