RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE I am not here to do your research for you...I am organizing opposition to the asset sale. Why? Because as a shareholder at 0.60/share it is in my best interest to vote down this asset sale. Period. If it was in my best interest to vote yes to this asset sale that is what I would be campaigning for, but it simply is not in my best interest. If you want answers contact FIU management, or do your own research. Getting aggressive with me on an anonymous forum will get you nowhere - I am not here to hold your hand and tell you everything will be okay. I am only a shareholder, I have taken a leadership position on stockhouse.com because discussions were getting derailed as they are now. And it is my opinion that voting no to the asset sale offers the best avenue for shareholders. If you want my reasoning they are here:
https://www.stockhouse.com/Bullboards/MessageDetail.aspx?s=FIU&t=LIST&m=30872742&l=0&pd=0&r=0
https://www.stockhouse.com/Bullboards/MessageDetail.aspx?s=FIU&t=LIST&m=30875377&l=0&pd=0&r=0
Our shareholder group now holds 5.5 Million shares against the asset sale. There are 41,000,000 other shares voting against the asset sale. There are no large shareholders voting for MWS, that is a fact. MWS will be voted down. I encourage anyone who opposes the asset sale to add their voice to the movement.
firsturaniumshareholders@gmail.com
https://www.stockhouse.com/Groups/GroupInfo.aspx?g=50962