RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: EGM date requirement Hi D,
We have two lists because we thought it a good idea to have a back up. So, when I announced that I was getting the list a while back, I also encouraged others who contacted me to do the same, in case I was unsuccesful in obtaining it.
The fact the Mike was proactive in obtaining the list is a good thing because this involves a higher level of commitment. He is thus far better prepared and organised than he would have otherwise been had he sat around waiting for someone else to get it. As a result, he has a template/letter for a mailing campaign and a group of people committed to making calls as well. What we should now do is combine what we've achieved thus far independently and hit the ground running as one team.
Although I would certainly appreciate any contributions towards the obtention of my list, I think it's only fair that anyone who wants to contribute and hasn't done so yet, send their contributions to Mike first, as he is still short some money and had stated from the onset that him obtaining the list was contingent upon receiving contributions from other board members.
For my part, it was always my intention to obtain the list regardless of whether I received any contributions from fellow board members. Therefore, since Mike has also been successful in obtaining the list, please support his effort. We are both working really hard against this deal and the time has come for EVERYONE who is genuinly against the asset sale to band together.
BillyK