RE: MiningMx article - shows serious problem for a Here is what I meant about the need for a further credit facility to deal with EZ costs...
"Operational challenges resulted in the Ezulwini operation losing money and consuming cash at a greater rate than planned, however, management was in the process of implementing a detailed action plan, which included clearing the fall of ground, correcting the trackless section operating conditions and dealing with the mechanical condition of the trackless equipment on the level."
https://www.miningweekly.com/article/first-uranium-gold-sales-drop-15-shares-plummet-2012-04-19
This NR is loaded, which explains the huge share price drop - first 36.6M becomes 26.6M because of the Gold One credit facility, then we are told that FIU actually needs to have enough cash on hand to deal with any asset liabilities...which I think refers to situations such as "clearing the fall of ground, correcting the trackless section operating conditions and dealing with the mechanical condition of the trackless equipment on the level." How much will that cost? Who knows....but that 26.6M will probably be reduced a lot further in the next month. I feel like we are paying Gold One to buy Ezulwini...
If your a shareholder and your voting yes then you are voting for 0.0/share, maybe 0.5/share, and if your lucky 0.11/share, because the escrow fund will be depleted with class action suits before you can snap your fingers. I cannot wait to see how all this plays out, this asset sale does not have a hope in he*l of being voted through.