Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

First Uranium Corporation T.FIU



TSX:FIU - Post by User

Comment by colt451on May 08, 2012 3:48pm
144 Views
Post# 19886315

RE: Question 50% stake

RE: Question 50% stake

Well according to Betsky

"He added he was willing to be diluted 100% through bringing in a new partner, which would hopefully also lend First Uranium the $150-million it needs to repay debentures on June 30."

"This way both bondholders and shareholders get a better deal," commented Betsky.

 

In my opinion, we are a lot better off following Betsky and the other large shareholder's lead, they receive the same compensation that we get and they have no reason to mis-lead us, I have done my own DD and I agree...dilution/bankruptcy/better offer, anything is better than the current asset sale terms for shareholders. Everyone is getting taken care by this asset sale except shareholders...well they can't screw us over unless we let them. 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>