Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

First Tidal Acquisition Corp T.AAA


Primary Symbol: V.AAA.P

First Tidal Acquisition Corp. is a Canada-based capital pool company. The Company's principal business is the identification and evaluation of a qualifying transaction and once identified or evaluated, to negotiate an acquisition or participation in a business subject to receipt of shareholder approval, if required, and acceptance by regulatory authorities. The Company has not generated revenues from operations.


TSXV:AAA.P - Post by User

Post by franky06on Oct 23, 2012 1:38pm
154 Views
Post# 20514508

BHP should....

BHP should....

 

Peter Koven, National Post
Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2012
 
Mining giant BHP Billiton Ltd. continues to move forward with Jansen, a massive Saskatchewan-based project that is expected to become the largest potash mine in the world. But is it the right move? Analysts at BMO Capital Markets don’t think so.
 
In a lengthy report, Joel Jackson and Tony Robson argue that building Jansen is BHP’s “worst” option if it wants to diversify into potash, though they think that whole concept could be a mistake.
 
“We believe that the best decision for BHP is [to] not build or buy its way into the potash industry, and instead return cash to shareholders. However, we expect BHP will not go down this route,” they wrote in a note.
 
Put simply, they think that the economics of Jansen are not attractive. Using a potash price of US$450 a tonne (just below current levels), they projected an internal rate of return (IRR) for Jansen of just 10%. To get to a more reasonable IRR of 12% to 15%, they calculated that a “lofty” long-term price of at least US$600 would be required.
 
The problem is that building Jansen could put pressure on prices, because it would bring more product into a market that is already well supplied right now. Mr. Jackson and Mr. Robson believe that potash demand is adequately covered out to the mid-2020s without Jansen. And while they wrote that the decision to build Jansen can be justified by taking a much longer-term view and focusing on the period beyond 2025, they noted that is “inherently riskier” because of the forecasting challenges.
 
If BHP is convinced it needs to get into potash, the analysts suggested that a better option would be to buy rather than build. While Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Inc. is out of the question after the failed 2010 bid, they wrote that Mosaic Co. could be a good option. Mosaic could present fewer Canadian political headaches it is a U.S. company operating in Saskatchewan. However, BHP would need to be comfortable with Mosaic’s large phosphate business and other unique issues.
 
“We note that purchasing Mosaic and shelving Jansen argues for better potash prices in the future, making the ‘buy’ option an asymmetrically better bet,” they wrote.
Bullboard Posts