Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Sandstorm Metals & Energy Ltd STTYF



GREY:STTYF - Post by User

Comment by elmothefearlesson Feb 15, 2013 7:43pm
306 Views
Post# 20998661

RE: SND's chart is looking bad!

RE: SND's chart is looking bad!

I've read that Sandstorm doesn't expect production from the new stream until 2022.  From a numbers perspective, I'm not unhappy with this stream, as usual.  Here are some numbers to consider:

 

- a small portion of HNE is still expected to be mined.  NPV per ETG website is $130 million.  Based on my calc.'s about 75% of the value of that $130 million is copper.  So $130 million x 2.5% = ~$3 million that SND should realize in the next 1-2 years from the stream.  This brings our net investment to ~$2 million.

 

- assuming the stream pays out ~$4 million a year 10 years from now for >40 years, the PV of this stream is ~$40 million based on a 10% discount factor.  Yeap, $40 million.

 

- if we discount that $40 million back to today (10 years before the cash flow begins), the NPV is $15 million.

 

- if we reduce the NPV by the $2 million we won't earn back in the next 2 years, the NPV is $13 million.  So not bad.

 

Another way to look at it, of course, is that we are paying $2 million net, for a $4 million / year stream for > 40 years.

 

The numbers are fantastic, frankly.  Of course, this is where potential geographical and political risks come in to play... we'd never get a deal like this done in Canada.  But considering it accounted for 3.6% of our market cap., it's definitely not going to make or break us.

 

All in all, a deal that makes sense.

 

Makes you wonder, though, why Nolan just didn't pay in cash.  We have the money.  Leads one to believe we have a new deal on the horizon that they are saving for.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>