The Court, having considered Plaintiff Wi-LAN Inc.'s Renewed Motion for Judgment
as a Matter of Law of No Invalidity or, Alternatively, Motion for New Trial on
Invalidity, the response thereto, and the papers filed in this action, is of the
opinion that Wi-LAN's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law should be
GRANTED.
It is therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the jury verdict finding
claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326 and claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent N
o. 6,381,211 invalid as anticipated, and the jury verdict finding claims 2, 5,
and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326; claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,222,819; and
claim s 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,381,211 invalid as obvious are set aside.
It is further ORDERED that claims 2, 5, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326;
claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,222,819; and claim s 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No.
6,381,211 are not invalid.