Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Puda Coal Inc PUDA

Puda Coal, Inc. (Puda) is a supplier of high-grade metallurgical coking coal to the industrial sector in the People’s Republic of China (the PRC or China). Its processed coking coal is primarily purchased by coke and steel producers for the purpose of making the coke required for the steel manufacturing process. Puda’s operations are conducted by Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co., Ltd (Shanxi Coal), which it controls through 90% indirect equity ownership. Puda cleans raw coking coal sourced from third-party coal mines primarily located in Liulin County, Shanxi Province, and markets the cleaned, coking coal to coke and steel makers. Its primary geographic markets include Shanxi Province, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hebei Province, Beijing and Tianjin, China. It purchases raw coal from a diversified pool of local coal mines in Shanxi Province.


GREY:PUDA - Post by User

Post by coldheaton Feb 12, 2014 12:17am
128 Views
Post# 22198511

Trellus Motion denied

Trellus Motion denied
ORDER denying [288] Motion: Ordered: Motion denied. The time for a motion for reconsideration has long passed -- many of the arguments herein are simply that. To the extent there is now evidence that plaintiffs believe should be before this Court, and that relates to the underwriters, they have separately briefed that. The fact that there may now be evidence as to which plaintiffs believe section 11/12 claims should/could be based, that does not alter the Court's original rational regarding timeliness and the other basis for denial. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 2/10/2014) (tn)
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>