TSXV:BTI.H - Post by User
Comment by
Sniper007on Mar 27, 2014 4:31pm
140 Views
Post# 22378394
RE:RE:RE:Good news but...
RE:RE:RE:Good news but...
I would say "annoyed" is putting it lightly JD. What a joke.
You bring up a lot of good points JD and I agree with you Sir_Holler (Where is the survival/efficacy data from last summer?). Maybe this conference is a precursor to the survival/efficacy piece? Not likely anytime soon given how long it's taken to see the 1st paper from TTU, or shall I say - HAVEN'T SEEN!!! Arggg.
BTI is doing very good things, no question, but they are often missing the bullseye, dropping the ball and not crossing the "T" and dotting the "I"s for "need to know" shareholders. Why is that happening BTI? Why?
Now that Medimmune is finished with the "first phase" of the collaboration, is it possible BTI has the resources now for another pharma, or two, to take on new collaborations? If there are indeed pharma's knocking at the door, could BTI not charge two pharmas 5 million each and then use the funds to take BT2111 to a phase 1 clinical trial? Thoughts? JD?
Frustrated.
Sniper