Legitimate questions are a good thing.
Proclamations of doom and despair serve no one... and can hurt the SP of the very company one "claims" to be a shareholder of... which may not be the case for some and can indeed be an intentional attack on the company to disrepudiate and sow the seeds of doubt for a personal agenda . Anyone who gets into this game knows there are calculated risks which can be indentified and often quantified through their own DD so one can stay in or get out if the water is too hot for their liking.
As in the case of EPO the designation vote tomorrow...that is a very small risk on a 1 to 10 scale... I give it a weak 1.
To me the risk factors is maybe a 2 ( for no particular reason) attached to the ratification by the indian government...while very frustratingly slow ..there has been NO as in ZERO indication through many available resources and public statements that this is nothing more a maddenly slow procedural matter complicated by a very complex contract with absolutely huge numbers.... which I dont think most investors out there have a true understanding of the magnitude of. We are talking close to a billion dollars a year here for long term. That in turn to me mitigates the financing question to almost a risk factor of zero as in a non issue and so on.
As far as company management goes they are all pros with long sucessful track records and put their own money where their mouth is so risk factor there. 1 for no particular reason.
Governments are on on board so political inteference... zero risk.
Jusy my 2 cents worth of string along logic.So taken as a whole the risk with this stock is very low while the potential for reward is very very high as in multiples of existing stock prices.