RE:RE:RE:RE:This is all too cozy and convenient.DenV, the geology and economics are inextricably tied together. Impossible to evaluate one without the context of the other. The NPV calculation "attempts" to capture this combination through analysis of the prospective capital costs, operating costs, and revenues generated by the deposit. My perspective always is always a financial one, since that is what I do. Your perspective seems to be from the geological one, so, tell us what you think about the deposit that isnt captured in the NPV calculation. Obviously, only reserves are captured, and we know there is a lot more resource than that. What about the flukes? Any insight/opinions there? What gets you most charged up about the rocks? Where do you see upside thatr isnt captured by the latest FS? One thing most prominent to me (again, this is financial) is the discount rate. Once water permits are issued that 10% discount rate should experience immediate compression towards 5%. Thats a big pickup. How about the permits? Any insight into why the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board may or may not drag their heels? Why would they not want to grant this water permit ASAP and allow the revenue streams to commence as early as possible?