Question for directors and officers of NewportAccording to Bob Moriarty's write up and can be verified in company financials and with no news releases in 2013 about the royalty,
-
Holders of the 5.45 million options refused to pay $.10 a share up to December 18 of 2013 knowing the company had twice that in cash and Ms. Dunfield had agreed to reissue the options at $.05 based on inside information.
Why was it necessary to let the 10 cent options expire and grant the 5 cent options when you knew that the company had all that cash?