Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Newport Exploration Ltd V.NWX

Alternate Symbol(s):  NWXPF

Newport Exploration Ltd is a Canada-based natural resource company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of resource properties. In addition, the Company holds a 2.5% gross overriding royalty interest (the Royalty) on any hydrocarbons produced on certain petroleum exploration and production licenses in Australia. These include licenses being operated and explored by Beach Energy Ltd. (Beach) and Santos Ltd. (Santos), both major Australian oil and gas producers. The Company’s mineral exploration project is the Chu Chua Copper Gold Deposit (Chu Chua), which is located approximately 30 kilometers north of Kamloops, British Columbia. The deposit is a Cyprus-type volcanogenic massive sulfide body hosted in two steeply dipping lenses of massive pyrite-chalcopyrite and magnetite up to 40 meters (m) thick, with a known strike length of 400 m and a known depth of 250 m.


TSXV:NWX - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by lookin2retireon May 10, 2014 10:20am
222 Views
Post# 22547221

Question for directors and officers of Newport

Question for directors and officers of NewportAccording to Bob Moriarty's write up and can be verified in company financials and with no news releases in 2013 about the royalty,

  1. Holders of the 5.45 million options refused to pay $.10 a share up to December 18 of 2013 knowing the company had twice that in cash and Ms. Dunfield had agreed to reissue the options at $.05 based on inside information.

Why was it necessary to let the 10 cent options expire and grant the 5 cent options when you knew that the company had all that cash?
Bullboard Posts