RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:SpNo savage, it's fine, so long as they do NOT lie.
I used to own gwmgf, before the house cleaning in management, and running in place, while about 150M in raised $, has presently dwindled down to about 20M, and bv gone negative, and the vision, not even close "IMO!!!" of being realized. Those are facts. If people want to deal in FACTS, fine, but if they want to purposely distort them, and tell bald faced lies, I'll call em' on it. Do I make mistakes, yes, but when asked a straight forward question, I answer it, and when the FACTS change, so does my opinion, especially with respect to gwg/gwmgf.
Not pumping here, I just looking forward to TC providing Q2 production numbers in early July, they should be quite good. They talked about building a world class mine, and becoming a diversified miner/refiner, and have accomplished that, and should have the SIGNIFICANTLY increasing revenues to prove it.
Also, some here used t-med "dilution" as a boogey-man issue. Kinda' funny, 86% of former t-med holders have common stock now, yet volume is relatively light, they are NOT dumping, and some of the recent gains are holding, who woulda' thunk it?! This guy! NOT some of you naysayers! Then again, most here weren't buying when it was DIRT cheap, sub $2, babbling about "there being a reason for that", and they probably aren't buying now either. I'm a BUYER at the 50 dma and below, at each and every level of support. Any FOOLS wanna' sell me some more, DIRT cheap, bring, It, ON! michelle, dare I say "Game on, it's a GO!" ROBUST EVEN!