RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Publishing revenue
yyz123 wrote: Wow you're thick shankwank. Dumb as a post. You continue to take two lines from two different posts and try to put them together. It shows how pathetic you are at tying to find an issue to debate.
The first line was related to having sufficient cash but needing to increase revenues. Cuz they're losing money ya know. The second was related to another moron trying to demonstrate tng could have significantly higher revs when a large piece isnt theirs to keep. Hence gross is unimportant, net is.
Please try and keep up. You bus drivers need to spend more time learning business 101.
Well now...lets review your BS-cuz you constantly BS and misrepresent purposefully by design in the body of your posts...so some informed on how to read numbers-filings-income statements and analyze a business case and actually constructed a business plan to the BDC-like moi` and calls you out on your BS? should not surprise anyone...including the selective fool that you are and wear admirabley.
These are your words-from your posts the other day in sequence-not exptrapolated from two different presentations or divergent discussions and what you put on this thread...lets review it once again...shall we...from the top.
"They have lots of cash in the bank. No fear of any insolvency. The question is can they grow top line. " Yakazz
Than later as from the direct quote in the full post above...the same sequence he posts this...
".....Which means you book about 22.50 on a $30 at retail game. Second, gross revenue is irrelevant...." Yakazz
Yup...talking/posting out ofboth sides of the mouth once again-and the stuff that is dribbling out of the corners down onto the chin-ani't ink either.
No wonder most poster just shake their heads.
Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.tng/transgaming-inc#wzCIvGFtzKzLCXeF.99
I dunno...but it appears pretty clear your out to lunch on pretty much all things related to TNG-including the above-throw out horsedung liberally-have google minimized at the bottom of the screen to ask it questions about material your clueless about in real time or otherwise...and other wise broken into two words...so I would think pretty much reviewing the above when you try to present top line and gross revenue as divergent animals where one doesn't mean anything as you say and than means everything as you conclude...that a collective voice of disapproval to you from the thread is being echo and sending a directive to just shut ta ____K up and go
back under the slime covered rock of posting address and find another body of posters
that cannot decipher accurately thru your presented HorseDung.
You are painted...nailed and tatooed as said.
Irrelevant/Irresponsible/Incompetent and Irrevocably irritating with an Inability
to be and remain " in the moment."
SS