Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Puda Coal Inc PUDA

Puda Coal, Inc. (Puda) is a supplier of high-grade metallurgical coking coal to the industrial sector in the People’s Republic of China (the PRC or China). Its processed coking coal is primarily purchased by coke and steel producers for the purpose of making the coke required for the steel manufacturing process. Puda’s operations are conducted by Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co., Ltd (Shanxi Coal), which it controls through 90% indirect equity ownership. Puda cleans raw coking coal sourced from third-party coal mines primarily located in Liulin County, Shanxi Province, and markets the cleaned, coking coal to coke and steel makers. Its primary geographic markets include Shanxi Province, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hebei Province, Beijing and Tianjin, China. It purchases raw coal from a diversified pool of local coal mines in Shanxi Province.


GREY:PUDA - Post by User

Post by coldheaton Sep 30, 2014 9:44pm
139 Views
Post# 22985178

Let me try to separate this to make it understandable

Let me try to separate this to make it understandable
Courts in this District have consistently affirmed that both Securities Act and Exchange Act claims are especially well-suited to class-wide adjudication.5 For this reason, the Court is respectfully requested to certify the following class and subclasses: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  A Section 10(b) class against the Underwriters consisting of: All purchasers of Puda common stock and call options on Puda common stock and sellers of put options on Puda common stock during the period commencing December 8, 2010, through the market close on April 7, 2011 (the “Class Period”), and who were damaged thereby; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  A Section 11 subclass against Puda, Zhao, the Underwriters and the Directors consisting of: All purchasers of Puda common stock pursuant or traceable to the public offering of Puda shares on or about December 8, 2010, and who were damaged thereby; and ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  A Section 12 subclass against Puda and the Underwriters consisting of: All purchasers of Puda common stock directly from the underwriters in the December 8, 2010, public offering or whose purchase of shares registered in such offering was solicited by Puda and/or the Underwriters for its financial interest, and who were damaged thereby.6 ------------------------------------------- Note 6**6 Excluded from the proposed class and subclasses are defendants, other officers and directors of Puda, members of their immediate families, and the heirs, successors or assigns of any of the foregoing ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The first 10b Class, the changed the dates range back out to April 7th for some reason, (I am just guessing that it has something to do with purchased Puts) and they removed all the other defendants, except for the underwriters. ------------------------------------------------ In the section 11 class, which was Puda/Zhao etal, they added the underwriters as well, stipulated that the qualified shares had to come from the offering. ------------------------------------------ They then added a section 12 subclass, (essentially for themselves) that created a separate pool of money that only direct shares qualify...(their own) and then they exclude officers , directors etc.. (which is puzzling) maybe some inside deal was made...I dunno... ---------------------------------------------- So the lead plaintiffs here....Trellus, has it's own class, and will likely dip into the 10b class for it's hedges that it lost money on as well. (maybe that is why they changed the date..) I dunno....speculating here. __________________________ I don't much like this.....What say you?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>