Cameco & the CRA wrt a POSSIBLE Fission BidDemoz:
In-fill drilling as (possibly) directed by RPA of other firm continue to have excellent results. Note the references to basement hosted. In mining (especially unpredictable) water inflow is the kiss of death) to a mining company's stock PPS. Again this point was stressed by Brent Cook in a recent BNN interview.
I continue to believe that payment of any back taxes assessed by the CRA c/would be negotiated for payment over any number of years. Point being, Cameco's CRA liability MAY not be as onerous (lump sump repayment) as being characterized here recently.
WRT Cameco and the CRA and a POSSIBLE bid for Fission. IMHO, when all is said and done, it could be possible that besides community service, Cameco MAY be able to negotiate a settlement based on annual payments - spread over a number of years. Especially as the Fed's (low oil) deficit will need other commodities to step up to the plate to cushion the impact. The Fed's need companies like Cameco to JV with Canadian junior(s) like Fission and minority interest international players in order to keep control of this strategic resource.
Speaking about oil...as also posted on this board, while nuclear reactors don't use oil products to produce energy there appears to be a correlation of negative (low) oil prices impacting fission.
FWIW
Cheers
Stanley