Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

CANEXUS CORP 6.5 PCT DEBS T.CUS.DB.D



TSX:CUS.DB.D - Post by User

Comment by Calgaryrideron Jan 28, 2015 11:51pm
191 Views
Post# 23375572

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Violation of the External Communication Policy

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Violation of the External Communication PolicyI have nothing to bash about this post.   It's wonderful.  I completely agree with th $2.55 valuation.
what we don't see eye to eye is our valuation for NATO.  

This is is already a midstream asset.  It's current value is exactly zero, exclusive of debt.  
I say this because it's just breaking even on cash flow.  I don't care what multiple you use, x times zero is zero.  

This is is exactly how the market is valuing it.  

The proof is in the stock price.

the value of the asset is no more than the contracts it already has in place.  

Why are you slapping a future higher cash flow on NATO when in a free market it clearly is not able to land contracts to fill it up?   Yes, there is upside benefit for any potentials suitor, but there is also the risk that they can't get more people to use it.   If it were sucha smokin deal we'd be at 10 trains already, but here CUS is stuck at 5.5......and who knows if those contracts will be renewed.  There is a lot of downside risk as well.  Maybe not at $0, but the risk linearly escalates as the price for NATO rises.   

I think a JV is a a possibility, BUT, there is a tonne of commercial risk there as well.  

I see an asset writedown coming and a dividend cut by MArch.....I don't see a great deal closing soon. .....maybe a deal, but not a pretty one.

again, the market values NATO at $0.  You can't refute it.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>