Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Clarocity Corp CLRYF

Clarocity Corp is a California based firm. The company is engaged in the development of real estate valuation software product and related technological products. Its products and services are MarketValue Pro Appraisal, Traditional Appraisal, AQC Appraisal Review, BPOPro, ANMPro and BPOMerge. The company also provides alternative valuation and appraisal fulfillment services. Most of its revenue is earned through the United States market.


GREY:CLRYF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Trelawnyon Jul 02, 2015 11:09am
190 Views
Post# 23886368

RE:RE:RE:35% Revenue growth

RE:RE:RE:35% Revenue growthHi LSCFA,
I wouldn't use net margins for a growth company like this. The reason is that essentially all funds will be used to fuel growth.

I would model off of Gross Margin or Revenue.

I am using a blended Gross Margin of approximately 36% and would expect that to grow.

My assumptions are that the newer business using the BPO Merge products and the newer Axis products will have margins in the 50% to 70% range.

Older Axis products/serivces would have lower G.M in the 30% range. 

At this point I am weighting the G.M. very much towards the Older Axis products.

Given that the bulk of growth will be stemming from the newer products I would assume that the growth of the new marginal revenue would have higher G.M.s.

The quality of the revenue is also what I would characterize as re-occuring (vs. recurring) and is broadly diversified. This gives the new revenue a higher multiple than the traditional revenue from Axis.

I am using a blended revenue multiple of 2.3x top line revenue and using an year end exit run-rate revenue of $75mm.

This is assuming 2/3 of the revenue is coming from traditional products and services and 1/3 from the newer products and services.

Highly re-occuring revenue which is broadly diversified can have multiples in the 4x to 7x depending on the revenue growth.

I am overweighting of the traditional revenue and the lower multiples on revenue in order to create a more conservative pricing model. Which means that many different sections of the model can be wrong and the price still be close even with the errors.

I am using a share count of approximately 320mm shares (fully diluted).

So using that model you can do your own math on the price:
$75mm/ 320mm shares = $0.23revenue/share X 2.3 revenue mutliple =  54 cent share price


Using the current pro-forma revenue:
$50mm/320mm shares = $0.16 revenue /share X 2.3 revenue multiple = 37 cent share price

If you believe, as I do, that the mix will be more skewed to the newer, higher margin, revenue then you can increase the revenue multiple.

I would counsel against going too crazy with the revenue multiple until we see the proper results come out.

But I think that this very simple model will give you some understanding of where the market will begin to price this stock.


I hope this helps somewhat.

Best regards,




Trelawny
 


Bullboard Posts