RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:NewsI sent an email and got a response so if others want, go ahead and try it. I suggested the necessity of a clearer statement on Simon's departure was necessary. That suggestion was dodged although he did suggest the selling we are seeing is due to panicking, in the summer period of low volume, which I think is a bit unfair, I would call it more justifiable fear of uncertainty which could be cleared up, perhaps, by a company statement about Simon's departure. I take the recent NR and posting of the article on Geo's website to be an attempt to reassure us that all is well with Montviel and the separation process. And, of course, there is the fact that now we can read the technical report which I skimmed through, concentrating on the summary and conclusions. They do call it a technical report for a reason.
To me the financing of Innord is the most important thing. It is fine for writers to say that the process is "fairly impressive" but until someone puts some money into it, it is just talk. I have been invested in other companies with impressive sounding innovations or ideas, but they never got the financing so I anxiously await an update on Innord. Although the PEA will be of interest also. :)
Also, Simon is still a Director since he was voted in by shareholders and the inference that I draw is that he would have to resign voluntarily which he hasn't done.