Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by PamplonaTraderon Aug 20, 2015 12:04pm
118 Views
Post# 24035964

RE:RE:RE:RE:Re New hot spot

RE:RE:RE:RE:Re New hot spot
Boscoe2015 wrote: Pamps ... A NI 43-101 isn't about a rough resource calculation ... and the high grade uranium "if" "believe" "should be" in this rectangle or circle doesn't work for me. When is the "official" resource estimate coming? What is your guess for indicated and inferred ... for the record. Jmo. 



I see you also have issues with the English language.  

Did you miss the part where we took just a fraction of a fraction of the total mineralized area and STILL arrived at 233mm lbs???

If we used the entire mineralized area and the 5-6% blended average we got between AR-14-30, AR-15-44b and AR-15-49c2, the resource would be much much larger.

Using actual math is a far cry from the childrens telephone game you accused us of using to generate estimates.
Bullboard Posts