RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:It's time to end this That's your solution to getting Treaty Creek drilled, Gringomalo? Teuton has to give up something in return for American Creek abandoning the defamation suit, because Teuton is responsible for all the expenditures American Creek was forced to make pursuing litigation over the title? You make it sound like American Creek had no influence upon its own decision to choose the expensive route or to continue along this expensive route when other possibilities might have made things better.
Besides, Judge Grauer settled the issue of compensation last November. To American Creek he awarded a specific sum of money, which he believed was all that American Creek truly deserved after all was said and done. If American Creek spent more than this amount, it was of American Creek's doing, not Teuton's; hence, Teuton is not responsible for it. I know Judge Grauer's award was a disappointment, but that was the ruling and that should be the end of it. Obviously you disagree and you want it all to continue. You're basing the need to continue the defamation suit on the idea that American Creek didn't receive enough compensation from Judge Grauer, so Teuton owes more and the defamation suit is the only way to get it.
So much for the finality of the Treaty Creek litigation and respect for the judicial decisions of the British Columbia Supreme Court..