RE:James Muraff (Singers spy) Blue55 slag is not paranoid but stating the obvious That was why judge Aldrich called it a close case. 01 solved the same dynamic IP problem but also had the good sense to document their solution. After all these years I can`t see PTAB or the CAFC reversing their decision on the patentability of the `479. Patent belongs to 01 communique and agreeded upon by the patent office on more than one request by Citrix and closed firmly during trial with logm. Aldrich stated to both parties close and that she would render in favour of 01. Citrix was insisted patent office made error to her court. She allowed the patent office to address validity during the stay process she placed on the case. Now we have the super spy advising to settle with O1. Settled today or on Jan 8 2016. O1 holds 98 percent card hand and Citrix poker face has no smile. Booya