Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

LAKE SHORE GOLD CORP 6.25 PCT DEBS T.LSG.DB



TSX:LSG.DB - Post by User

Post by JRaffleson Feb 05, 2016 5:47am
381 Views
Post# 24527250

Tahoe bid rumours

Tahoe bid rumoursIf there were to be a paper bid by Tahoe Resources for LSG, then I would not hold Tahoe paper, for headline reasons which include the following:-
  • The Tahoe Balance sheet at Sep 2015 includes $1.8bn of mining assets, which may be of questionable value in SA.
  • Tahoe cash amounts to $110bn, but this is offset by accounts payable and secured debt of $166bn = negative $56bn.
  • About $66bn of Tahoe cash resulted from a merger with Rio Alto.
  • I reasearch Rio Alto in 2013 and came to the conclusion that its mineral rights were dependant on the political whims in the location of its mining assets.
  • Tahoe's Kevin McArthur, together with Ian Telfer merged their former Glamis operations with McEwen's Goldcorp. 
  • G traded at $40 before the merger , but the SP collpsed to about $30 when the Glamis merger strike price was legal complete.  McEwen sought legal advice as there appeared to be SP management against the former G shareholders.
  • Telfer and McArthur expanded the merged G, but the G shareholders lost value in the empire building.  It could be that McArthur could again seek a corporate growth by aquisition, where shareholders may not participate to the same extent.
  • I bought LSG primarily for territorial security, there is plenty of risk in mining, without adding political uncertainties.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>