RE:onevictory.....Wow k unt Blue55 you have a potty mouth and a temper. It was your wording and finger pointing. Seems the post was removed stating you read the document. You did get a reply from Ludwigvanb
B
It's anonymous, but fairly certain regardless of the source it would have to be something evidentary for the judge to treat it "ex parte". Lioi appears to think that she had a responsibility to pass it on IAW rule 2.9. So it's not an email that says, I don't like CTXS and they're lying about non-infringement. To be relevant it would have to relate to infringement or the cross motions for fees. Is it useable, even if it is something important, that's the first thing that's going to be questioned or attacked.
For now it's a small excitement
This comes prior to the J OL AS YOU STATED. MMMMMM THIS IS BIG. BLUESKIES MONEY MONEY MY LITTLE HONEY.
Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/bullboard/v.one/01-communique-laboratory-inc#R7gMa3yEcUuEFQDv.99