RE:RE:RE:RE:Wrinkled old Slopes...Onlyone threatens with violence and accuses me for shareholders $$$$$ losses that they can not afford Brian would say do not play with what you cannot afford to lose. Thomas Shunk and his wife as me and my husband and other share holders including Gigi and Andrew sleep in the bed which they must make. Poor decisions are only yours to live by as any lawyer would state. You are responsible for your own actions as Bill Clnton would know but Hilory accepted his faults. As I say all great women wear the pants in the family. Judge Judy and Judge Sara. What will happen is probably this:
ONE asserts that it is entitled to a new trial if we agree that any one of the disputed claim constructions was erroneous, arguing that we must assess the constructions relating to all the disputed limitations before we can rest assured that the jury’s non-infringement finding was not infected by some error. Because the jury returned a general verdict of non-infringement after hearing multiple theories of non-infringement, ONE argues that “it would be impossible for this Court to discern whether the jury rester its verdict of non-infringement on the erroneous claim construction.” This is based on Akron Ohio code under 50,52 related to the broker evidence and the IP address presented