RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:EPA decision.I don't like either of the clowns on offer, and will not bother to vote for either of them.
But that is beside the point. This is not a political forum, and as far as NAK is concerned, I'm looking at this purely from the perspective of an investor.
Anybody who doesn't think a crime has been committed in the premature rejection of this project - without the company having even had the opportunity to submit a permit application after spending ovder $150 million preparing to do so - should go back and read naugler's excellent post from July 10.
The fact is there is every possibility this project will revisited - and perhaps even approved - in the not too distant future. And that is true with or without the influence of Donald Trump.